Midwest Alerts
Renewable Energy Business
The summit is
designed for businesses and advocates for developing
economic opportunities for manufacturers in the
renewable energy field. In addition to its keynote
speakers, the summit will include sessions on analyzing
potential energy initiatives and inclusion of domestic
content through regulatory and legislative processes.
"This
is an important step forward for businesses in
"This is a state that has led the world in several areas, from cars to corn flakes. Today, however, we stand at a critical juncture in developing new industry for
"Clean renewable energy technology is the future, and with $10 billion already invested and more than 220 manufacturers supplying wind and solar components, we've already started down the path to make it part of
"Wind and solar energy investors around the world are looking to jurisdictions that have clear and well-defined targets for energy development and a comprehensive policy framework to support renewable energy investment. There are several entities advocating for various aspects of clean energy in
"Midwest Integrated Suppliers will play a unique role in coordinating all interested parties in reviewing and ranking initiatives that increase renewable energy-related manufacturing and services; advocating for policy change that incorporates a greater incentive to use
The registration fee for the conference is $45.00 for members; $85.00 for non-members. For those registering for the summit, an introductory membership rate of $95.00 for six months is available. To attend 2012 Energy Moves
Will Shale Crowd Out Coal and Green Energy?
Common wisdom is suggesting
that the fate of shale-gas here will outshine all
competing energy forms.
But is that logic
well-considered?
Estimates are that at least a century's worth of
shale-gas is now recoverable from underneath
"With
the new abundance and lower prices, lower-carbon gas
seems likely to play a much larger role in the
generation of electric power," writes Daniel
Yergin, in his new book,
The Quest.
By comparison, nuclear
would seem expensive,
while coal would appear to be more carbon intensive.
Meantime, it
creates "a more difficult competitive environment for
wind projects."
Yergin, however, is
admonishing policymakers not to rely exclusively on
shale-gas.
That's because too many factors can disrupt markets and
include everything from politics to environmental and
natural disasters.
Shale will not just become a
In
Quest,
Yergin points to the Japanese nuclear accident and the
Arab Spring that caused oil prices to spike as two
geo-political events simultaneously occurred.
Both had a tremendous effect on the energy economy.
But the energy analyst adds that shale-gas is most
impacted by the environmental issues here.
To extract the
shale-gas that is embedded inside of rocks, a concoction
of water, sand and chemicals is pumped a mile beneath
the earth's surface.
Not only does it taka huge amount of water, but
the mixture that comes back t the top is filty.
Many communities have therefore expressed concern
about heir water quality…
At the same time,
the outlook says that natural gas is projected to be the
fastest growing fossil fuel, while coal and oil are
likely to lose market share as all fossil fuels
experience reduced growth rates.
Fossil fuels’
contribution to primary energy growth is projected to
fall from 83 percent to 64 percent…
Shale's rise will undoubtedly make a dent in the
How
Not long ago, Apple boasted that its products were made
in
It isn't just that
workers are cheaper abroad.
Rather,
Apple's executives believe the vast scale of overseas
factories, as well as the flexibility, diligence and
industrial skills of foreign workers, have so outpaced
their American counterparts that "Made in the U.S.A." is
no longer a viable option for most Apple products…
Companies like Apple "say the challenge in setting up
It is hard to estimate how much more it would cost to
build iPhones in the
But such calculations are, in many respects, meaningless
because building the iPhone in the
Modernization has always caused some kinds of jobs to
change or disappear.
As the American economy transitioned from
agriculture to manufacturing and then to other
industries, farmers became steelworkers, and then
salesmen and middle managers.
These shifts have carried many economic benefits,
and in general, with each progression, even unskilled
workers received
better wages and greater changes at upward mobility.
But in the last two
decades, something more fundamental has changed,
economists say.
Mid-wage jobs started disappearing.
Particularly among Americans without college
degrees, today's new jobs are disproportionately in
service occupations—at restaurants or call centers, or
as hospital attendants or temporary workers—that offer
fewer opportunities for reaching the middle class…
Toward the end of a dinner President Obama hosted on
behalf of Steven Jobs and other
What remains unknown, however, is whether the
In the last decade, technological leaps
in
solar and wind
energy, semiconductor fabrication and display
technologies have created thousands of jobs.
But while many of
those industries started in
"New
middle-class jobs will eventually emerge," said Lawrence
Katz, a Harvard economist.
"But will someone in his 40s have the skills for
them?
Or will
he be bypassed for a new graduate and never find his way
back into the middle class?"
FITs are best to deal
with climate change, says
task force
A November 2011 report issued by the Intergovernmental
Panel on Climate Change, a European-based watchdog based
in
Several studies have concluded that some feed-in tariffs
have been effective and efficient at promoting renewable
energy electricity, mainly due to the combination of
long-term fixed price or premium payments, network
connections, and guaranteed purchase of all renewable
energy electricity generated.
Quota policies can be effective and efficient if
designed to reduce risk, for example, with long-term
contracts.
Although they have not succeeded in every country that
has enacted them, price-driven policies have resulted in
rapid renewable electric capacity growth and strong
domestic industries in several countries—most notably
FITs have encouraged both technological and geographic
diversity, and have been found to be more suitable for
promoting projects of varying sizes…A number of studies
have concluded that FITs have consistently delivered new
supply, from a variety of technologies, more effectively
and at lower coast than alternative mechanisms,
including quotas, although they have not succeeded in
every country that has enacted them… They generally have
lowered administrative costs than quota policies and are
considered easier to implement, though tariff setting
can be challenging, particularly if there are very
dynamic cost developments (as with photovoltaic in
recent years).
In
summary, a number of historical studies, including those
carried out for the European Commission, have concluded
that well-designed and well-implemented FITs are the
most efficient and effective
and support policies for promoting renewable energy
electricity.
Hemlock Semiconductor
expands silicon capacity despite
oversupply
"The
hope is that the market does come back into balance over
the next couple of years," Paul Leming, an analyst, said
in November.
He said that Hemlock’s decision to build the plant was
made when polysilicon prices were higher.
At this point it would cost as much to stop
production as to finish the factory because the company
already has signed contracts and purchase materials, he
said.
Hemlock announced plans to build the
Subsidies for renewable energy:
American as apple pie
The collapse this past August of Solyndra, a
But these complaints, and the related calls for free
market ascendance, ignore the basic historical fact that
energy subsidies have been both a constant in the
American narrative and essential to our country's
economic development… (F)irst, every great expansion of
the American economy can be linked to the discovery of a
new energy source.
Second, each of these new energy industries
received substantial government support at a pivotal
time in its early growth…
Over the full lifetime of subsidies, the oil and gas
industry has benefited from tax expenditures of, on
average, $4.86 billion per year between 1918 and 2009.
The renewables industry has received an average
of only $0.37 billion per year between 1994 and 2009.
It
is a simple and straightforward falsehood when
established energy industries or special interests
describe renewables as sops for federal money.
Rather, the renewables industry is getting
relatively
less government help, not more, than traditional
competitors.
Additionally,
disappointments like Solyndra must be kept in
perspective.
For every
successful 19th-century
coal operation, dozens, perhaps even hundreds of
projects collapsed in bankruptcy.
Looking at
the solar industry, several companies have received the
same loan guarantees as Solyndra, but they are not
making news; rather, they are well-managed companies
that are growing and quietly creating jobs across the
country.
Finally, it is important to note that early energy
subsidies for coal, oil and gas were never phased out,
even as those energy sources matured.
The existence of these subsidies (for in some
cases more than a century) makes the competitive
landscape look less like a level playing field and more
like a black diamond ski slope for renewables.
It also means that those who call for an end to
ALL subsidies may end up with a surprising outcome:
in many regards, the profitability of these
industries has risen and remains elevated upon the backs
of taxpayers….
Calls for an end to renewable subsidies ignore the
lessons of American history.
It has long been, and should continue to be, the
case that government investment supports the growth of
emerging energy sources.
History teaches that such support helps drive
…News in brief… News in brief… News in brief…
News in brief...
In his State of the Union speech on Tues., Jan. 24,
Pres. Barack Obama
pressed for local content.
"It is time to stop supporting businesses that
ship jobs overseas and reward companies that create jobs
here…If the playing field is level," he said, "I promise
you that America will always win."
Pres. Obama also cited Brian Ritterby, an
employee working for Holland-based
Energetx,
who stated "he is proud to be part of building the clean
energy industry" in this country.
The President
also pressed Congress to set a clean energy standard for
the country, with the U.S. Dept. of Defense setting an
example.
And he
pressed for energy efficiencies in the manufacturing
industry that secondarily will provide new jobs in
repairing
Manufacturing grew in December at the
fastest pace in six months, and hiring at
The American Wind Energy Association (AWEA) has
established a tradition of taking a look back at the
events that shaped the year in wind power.
Two
highpoints:
Wind turbine
prices have dropped sharply in recent years, and a
government report released last year says they decreased
by as much as 33 percent or more between 2008 and 2010…Last
year marked the launch of WindMadeâ„¢, a new consumer
label that will highlight companies getting a large
portion of their electricity form wind power.
Already 15 companies—including Motorola Mobility,
Deutsche Bank, and Bloomberg—have committed to attaining
the new label by getting at least 25 percent of their
electricity from wind energy.
The Board of State Canvassers approved the
wording of a
ballot initiative on Jan. 20 that would raise the
state's renewable energy standard to 25 percent by 2025.
A coalition
called "Michigan Energy, Michigan Jobs" backs the
initiative.
Supporters of the
energy initiative have until July 9 to collect 322,609
valid signatures and file the petitions with the
Secretary of State.
If the petition drive is successful, voters would
decide the issues in the Nov. 6 election.
If
approved by voters, the
initiatives would amend the state constitution.
Exelon Corp. has announced that
construction has been completed on its 50-turbine, 90MW
U.S. Energy Sec. Steven Chu
said that the deployment of solar, wind and other
renewable energy was outpacing the development of a
modern electricity grid, and that the country
risked falling behind others in the use of advanced grid
technologies. "It is only a matter of time before solar
energy becomes equal in cost to many forms of fossil
(fuels).
Whether it is going to be 10 years or 15 years, there is
a debate,"
(Sources for all:
Ken Silverstein,"Will Shale Crowd Out Coal and
Green Energy?," renewablesbiz/covering the business of
renewable and sustainable energy; Charles Duhigg and
Keith Bradsher, “How U.S. Lost Out on iPhone Work," New
York Times; "Feed-in Tariffs Best to Deal with Climate
Change,"
pgipe@igc.org;
Crain's Detroit Business; Paul Egan, Detroit Free Press;
Associated Press, New York Times;
mlive.com;
huffingtonpost.com.